Understanding Childhood Trauma and Its Lifelong Impact

Introduction

Childhood trauma represents one of the most pressing public health challenges globally, with research indicating that approximately one billion children aged 2-17 years experience some form of violence annually [1]. This staggering figure translates to roughly half of all children worldwide, with rates reaching 44% in high-income countries and climbing to 59% in low and middle-income nations [2].

My motivation for examining this topic stems from witnessing the impact of a medical professional I associated with and her actions on our children. Despite her oath to ‘do no harm’, she obtained a divorce through international legal manipulation. Her subsequent choices – rapid introduction of a new partner within weeks, multiple residential changes, and systematic alienation – showcase how childhood trauma can occur even within professional families [3].

These early life experiences alter both individual and societal well-being. Studies consistently demonstrate that traumatic childhood experiences increase the risk of various physical and mental health problems throughout life. Research suggests these experiences can reduce lifespan by up to 20 years [4].

The financial implications demand attention. Health consequences of child maltreatment cost approximately 2% of gross domestic product in regions like East Asia and the Pacific [5]. This economic burden highlights the widespread impact across communities and healthcare systems.

Childhood trauma includes physical and emotional abuse, neglect, exposure to domestic violence, parental separation, and household dysfunction [6]. Research reveals that around 70% of traumatised children experience an average of three different types of trauma [7]. This overlap creates complex patterns of harm requiring careful understanding.

Early identification and intervention show promise for positive change. Evidence demonstrates that adverse experiences during childhood affect health outcomes by altering brain architecture, stress response systems, and genetic expression [8]. Yet intervention remains crucial – longitudinal studies of individuals who experienced abuse and neglect show only 22% achieved healthy adult functioning by young adulthood without support [9].

This comprehensive post will examine the multifaceted nature of childhood trauma, from its various forms and immediate impacts to its long-term consequences. We’ll investigate the scientific underpinnings of trauma’s effects on development, examine specific types of traumatic experiences, and understand their lasting implications across physical, emotional, and social domains.

What Defines Traumatic Experiences

Childhood trauma takes many forms, from apparent physical harm to subtle emotional wounds that often go unnoticed. Research indicates that approximately one-third of the general population experiences these traumatic events before age 18 [10]. These experiences range from physical abuse and neglect to more nuanced forms of harm like emotional manipulation and household dysfunction.

The American Psychiatric Association defines these experiences as events that threaten injury, death, or physical integrity, causing fear, terror, and helplessness [11]. Scientists classify childhood stress into three categories:

1. Good stress that promotes healthy growth.
2. Bearable stress that can be managed through intervention.
3. Toxic stress causes lasting damage to both the brain and the body [8].

Understanding Childhood Trauma Types

Research has identified several distinct categories of childhood trauma that can affect young lives [12]. These classifications help professionals identify and respond to different forms of harm:

• Physical abuse involves non-accidental injury, including bruises, burns, and broken bones [13].
• Emotional abuse manifests through harmful verbal interactions, persistent criticism, and psychological manipulation.
• Sexual abuse encompasses inappropriate sexual activity with older individuals.
• Meanwhile, neglect represents a failure to meet basic physical or emotional needs [14].

Research shows that around 70% of traumatised children experience multiple forms of trauma simultaneously [7]. The timing of these experiences significantly influences their impact. Studies indicate that trauma experienced in the first five years of life often leads to more severe emotional and developmental consequences than similar experiences occurring later in childhood [15].

Environmental stressors also play a crucial role. These include exposure to domestic violence, substance abuse in the household, and parental mental illness [16]. The loss of a parent through death, divorce, or incarceration creates another layer of trauma that shapes a child’s developmental trajectory.

Early Warning Signs

Children experiencing childhood trauma exhibit various indicators across behavioural, cognitive, and emotional domains [17]. Changes in academic performance often signal underlying trauma, with studies showing decreased grade point averages and attention difficulties [18]. Sleep disturbances emerge as another key indicator, particularly in cases of sexual abuse [19].

Physical symptoms include unexplained medical issues and increased healthcare visits [20]. Behavioural changes manifest through missing school, difficulty with social interactions, and problems with emotional regulation [21]. Children might display heightened anxiety, depression, or extreme emotional responses.

Warning signs vary by age and developmental stage. Adolescents might exhibit risk-taking behaviours, substance use, or suicidal tendencies [22]. Younger children often show regression in developmental milestones or changes in play patterns.

Common Misconceptions

The impact of childhood trauma involves several critical misunderstandings. Research shows that only 22% of individuals who experienced childhood abuse achieve healthy adult functioning without intervention [9]. The belief that “time heals all wounds” proves incorrect, as trauma remains preserved throughout life, like footprints in wet cement [23].

Many assume children readily disclose traumatic experiences. Studies reveal that fear, shame, and self-blame often prevent immediate disclosure, particularly in cases of sexual abuse [24]. The scope of trauma includes both dramatic events and chronic, everyday experiences of stress and conflict [25].

Healthcare providers often hold incorrect assumptions about child protection systems and reporting requirements [26]. These misconceptions can prevent proper identification and intervention, leaving children vulnerable to ongoing trauma.

The Science of Long-Term Impact

The scientific evidence linking childhood trauma to lasting health effects continues to grow, revealing complex biological mechanisms that shape development throughout life [27]. These effects emerge through multiple pathways, altering brain structure, stress response systems, and genetic expression.

Research shows early life adversity changes nervous, endocrine (hormone-producing), and immune system development, leading to impaired cognitive, social, and emotional functioning [28].

Biomedical studies have identified specific neurological, hormonal, and immunological changes in those exposed to early adversity [29]. The impacts include increased risk of mental health conditions, physical illnesses, and altered stress responses that can persist for decades.

This growing body of evidence helps explain why traumatic experiences in childhood often lead to increased rates of both physical and mental health conditions in adulthood [30].

How Trauma Shapes Development

Early experiences of childhood trauma fundamentally alter brain development at multiple levels – from cellular changes to entire neural networks [31]. During critical developmental periods, traumatic stress affects the formation of brain architecture, particularly in regions controlling emotion, memory, and stress response [32].

Studies reveal decreased volume in key brain areas, including the hippocampus (region crucial for memory and emotion), prefrontal cortex, and cerebellum (area responsible for movement and specific cognitive functions) among individuals who experienced early trauma [33].

These structural changes correlate with emotional regulation, memory formation, and executive function difficulties. The timing of trauma proves particularly significant, as different brain regions show varying vulnerability during specific developmental windows [34].

The body’s stress response system undergoes significant modification, with research showing persistent changes in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (the system controlling stress hormones and other crucial body functions) [35]. This alteration affects cortisol production and regulation, influencing how individuals respond to stress. The disrupted stress response can lead to increased inflammation and altered immune function [36].

Childhood Trauma: Risk and Protective Factors

The impact of childhood trauma varies significantly among individuals and is influenced by both genetic and environmental factors [37]. Research identifies several key elements that either increase vulnerability or offer protection against trauma’s effects. Genetic variations in stress response systems can influence how severely trauma affects development [38].

Environmental factors play a crucial role in determining outcomes. Studies show that positive relationships, particularly with responsive caregivers, can buffer against trauma’s adverse effects [39]. The presence of supportive adults, stable home environments, and access to mental health resources significantly improves outcomes for children who experience trauma [40].

The interaction between genetic predisposition and environmental experiences creates unique patterns of risk and resilience. Research indicates that some genetic variants may increase susceptibility to trauma’s effects while others might offer protection [41]. Understanding these interactions helps identify which children might need additional support and intervention.

Breaking Cycles of Harm

Understanding how childhood trauma creates lasting biological changes offers hope for breaking cycles of harm [42]. Research shows that early intervention can help prevent the cascade of biological adaptations that lead to long-term health problems [43].

Studies highlight the importance of timing in intervention efforts. The brain’s plasticity during early development presents both vulnerability to trauma and opportunity for healing [44]. Programmes that support parents with trauma histories show particular promise in preventing transmission to the next generation [45].

Evidence suggests that therapeutic interventions can help reverse some biological changes caused by early trauma [46]. This understanding has led to the development of trauma-informed approaches that consider both psychological and physiological aspects of healing.

Physical and Emotional Childhood Trauma

Research reveals that childhood trauma often involves multiple forms of abuse occurring simultaneously, creating layers of harm that affect both body and mind [47]. Studies indicate that approximately 75% of abused children experience at least one additional form of maltreatment, with one in five enduring three or more types of abuse [48].

The impact of childhood trauma varies based on timing, with abuse occurring in the first five years of life typically leading to more severe consequences than similar experiences later in childhood [15].

While physical abuse leaves visible marks on the body, its definition extends beyond apparent injuries. The American Professional Society on Child Abuse reports concerning statistics, with studies showing approximately 229 cases per 1,000 children in European countries [49].

Emotional abuse, though less visible, often causes deeper psychological wounds. This form of trauma includes patterns of belittling, blaming, and frightening behaviour that convey to children they are worthless, flawed, or unloved [50].

Research shows about 291 cases per 1,000 children experience emotional abuse, with studies indicating these “silent” forms of maltreatment can lead to more severe psychological consequences than other types of trauma [51].

These experiences impact health in numerous ways, increasing the risk of infectious diseases, respiratory disorders, and autoimmune conditions [52]. Mental health consequences include heightened anxiety, depression, and personality disorders, notably when emotional support is lacking during the recovery process [53].

Long-term studies reveal that individuals who experienced physical and emotional abuse show significantly lower social and psychological functioning in adulthood compared to non-abused groups [54]. The impact follows a graded relationship – the more adverse experiences in childhood, the higher the risk of negative health outcomes throughout life [55].

These early experiences affect multiple brain structures and functions, leading to changes in emotional processing and stress responses [56]. Research shows that traumatised individuals exhibit heightened threat reactivity and altered responses to emotional stimuli, reflecting how deeply these experiences become embedded in the nervous system [57].

Sexual Abuse and Inappropriate Exposure

The devastating impact of childhood trauma through sexual abuse affects approximately one in four girls and one in thirteen boys globally [58]. These experiences create profound brain function and emotional processing alterations, particularly affecting regions responsible for stress response and emotional regulation [59].

Sexual abuse encompasses any sexual act where an age-related power imbalance exists, including situations where victims cannot consent or are manipulated into consenting [60]. Research indicates that about 15% of females and 8% of males worldwide endure this form of abuse, with rates varying significantly across different populations [61].

Studies reveal distinct biological changes in abuse survivors, including alterations in immune system function and brain structure [62]. Reduced hippocampal and amygdala volumes are particularly concerning and crucial for memory formation and emotional processing [63]. These changes often correlate with difficulties forming secure attachments and maintaining healthy relationships in adulthood [64].

The psychological burden of childhood trauma from sexual abuse does not diminish with disclosure [65]. Instead, the period following disclosure often proves particularly vulnerable, with an increased risk of depression, anxiety, and suicidal thoughts [66]. Those who experienced prolonged abuse typically show more severe clinical symptoms than those with single-incident trauma [67].

Long-term studies demonstrate that sexual abuse survivors face increased risks of specific mental health challenges, including social anxiety disorder, generalised anxiety disorder, and panic disorders [68]. Physical health impacts emerge through various pathways, including higher rates of unexplained somatic symptoms and increased healthcare utilisation [69].

Research shows that sexual abuse during childhood significantly affects economic stability in adulthood [70]. Survivors often prefer avoiding high-pressure work environments, particularly male-dominated fields, which can limit career opportunities and earning potential [71]. These patterns reflect the deep-seated impact of trauma on life choices and future prospects.

Understanding Childhood Trauma in Parental Separation

Research reveals that childhood trauma through parental separation affects approximately 3.5 million children in the United States alone [72]. Studies indicate that children often experience this separation as emotionally equivalent to death-related loss, creating profound psychological impacts that can persist throughout life [73].

The effects of family structure changes appear early in development. Studies show that boys experiencing parental separation display significantly lower height at ages 7 and 11, though these differences typically resolve by age 16 [74]. Additionally, cognitive ability scores show measurable decreases at ages 8 and 15 years [75].

The first years following separation prove particularly crucial as family systems undergo destabilisation [76]. Children face significant challenges when parents struggle to move beyond their roles as former spouses to focus on shared parenting responsibilities [77]. This tension intensifies when custody arrangements become contentious, especially if parents hold negative perceptions of each other’s involvement with the children [78].

The impact of childhood trauma from parental separation varies based on several factors. Research highlights that a father’s absence during the first five years of life typically creates more substantial developmental effects than absence later in childhood [79]. Financial difficulties and maternal depression often act as significant mediating factors in how children respond to these changes [80].

Long-term studies reveal biological impacts, including accelerated ageing processes that affect health outcomes throughout life [81]. Women who experienced this form of childhood adversity show higher risks of heart disease and cardiovascular issues in adulthood [82]. The effects appear particularly pronounced when parental separation is combined with other adverse experiences [55].

Child Affected by Parental Relationship Distress (CAPRD), a recognised condition, occurs when children become entangled in parental conflict [83]. Approximately 19% of children face alienating behaviours during separation, including exposure to the disparagement of one parent by the other and pressure to take sides in conflicts [84]. These experiences can severely compromise children’s adaptation, especially when they previously enjoyed positive relationships with both parents [85].

Family Violence and Domestic Abuse

Research reveals that childhood trauma from family violence affects children’s developmental trajectories throughout life [86]. Studies consistently show exposure to multiple adverse experiences increases both victimisation and violence perpetration risks in adulthood [87].

Global statistics paint a troubling picture. One in three women experience intimate partner violence, with many incidents occurring in households with children [88]. This violence creates lasting impacts on child development, affecting both physical and psychological well-being [89].

Children exposed to domestic violence show marked differences in emotional regulation compared to their peers. Studies demonstrate smaller increases in baseline vagal tone (a measure of heart rate variation that indicates emotional regulation capacity), suggesting less adaptive development of regulatory functions over time [90]. After controlling for shared heritability, exposure to domestic violence is associated with lower IQ scores, averaging 8 points below unexposed children [91].

The effects appear in multiple ways. Healthcare professionals often identify domestic tension during home visits, noting its frequent overlap with other traumatic experiences [92]. Research indicates this form of childhood trauma creates complex patterns of harm that continue into adulthood [93].

Exposure typically occurs through direct and indirect means. Children witness verbal abuse between parents or guardians six or more times or physical abuse three or more times [94]. These experiences often remain hidden from the outside world, creating invisible but significant developmental impacts [93].

The prevalence rates exceed official statistics. In the UK, 2.5% of children under 11 years and 6.0% aged 11-17 years experience physical, sexual or emotional abuse or neglect yearly. These figures indicate maltreatment occurs 7 to 17 times more frequently than recorded reports suggest [95].

Studies show less physical violence occurs in families with strong cohesion, while higher levels emerge in high-conflict households [96]. The direction of violence, particularly father-figure towards mother-figure violence, influences behavioural outcomes and attitudes regarding gender and violence [97].

Gender differences appear in long-term impacts. Research reveals stronger associations between witnessing interpersonal violence and alcohol use disorders among females [98]. The effects create lasting neurophysiological patterns, including chronically elevated catecholamine (stress hormone) levels and heightened stress reactivity [99].

Childhood Trauma from Emotional Neglect

Studies reveal that childhood trauma from emotional neglect creates lasting developmental impacts [100]. Research shows the failure of caregivers to provide essential emotional needs like love, motivation, and support leads to significant psychological difficulties [50].

The American Academy of Pediatrics identifies this form of maltreatment as the most challenging type of child abuse to detect [101]. Unlike physical abuse, emotional neglect often remains hidden, occurring when caregivers create physical and verbal distance from their children [102].

Evidence indicates emotional neglect appears surprisingly common, with studies showing prevalence rates of 53.3% in specific populations compared to 18.4% in the general population [103]. This form of childhood trauma involves both passive elements, like lack of emotional affection, and active components, such as allowing exposure to inappropriate situations [104].

Children raised in neglectful environments show delayed physical development, including impacts on reproductive maturation [105]. Studies comparing institutionalised children exposed to prolonged neglect with briefly institutionalised children found significant differences in visual attention, memory, learning, and inhibitory control (the ability to control impulsive responses) [106].

The impact on cognitive development proves particularly concerning. Research demonstrates that children experiencing maltreatment during multiple developmental periods show more behavioural problems and lower IQ scores than those affected during only one period [107]. This reduced cognitive function stems from decreased neuronal activity (brain cell communication), leading to diminished synaptic connectivity (connections between brain cells) [108].

Research reveals emotional neglect strongly predicts mental health disorders, particularly depression, anxiety, and substance use [109]. Studies found that alexithymia (difficulty identifying and expressing emotions) often develops in neglected children, creating challenges in processing emotional experiences [110].

The lasting effects extend into relationship patterns. Emotional neglect significantly influences trust development and abandonment concerns, showing consistent associations with social isolation and feelings of vulnerability [111]. These early experiences affect children’s understanding of others’ perspectives and mental states [56].

Cultural context requires consideration, as communal caregiving in certain societies may provide emotional support through extended family networks [112]. However, supervision neglect, including failure to set limits or know children’s whereabouts, is associated with higher risks for personality disorders in adolescence [113].

The Impact of Parental Manipulation

Research reveals that childhood trauma often emerges through parental psychological control, involving manipulation of children’s thoughts and feelings through guilt, humiliation, and emotional blackmail [114]. Studies show these behaviours can include spurning, terrorising, rejecting, and isolating, conveying to children they are worthless or only valuable in meeting others’ needs [115].

Parents experiencing intense emotions during separation may develop distorted views of each other, affecting their co-parenting relationship [78]. This distortion can lead to negative interpretations of the other parent’s involvement, potentially damaging the child’s relationship with both parents [78].

Evidence indicates that perpetrators use various tactics to maintain control, including forcing secrets and threatening family breakdown [116]. These strategies mirror cult leadership approaches, demanding excessive devotion, reinforcing dependency, and using love withdrawal as punishment [117]. This form of childhood trauma creates complex patterns of harm that persist into adulthood [6].

Research demonstrates consistent links between psychological control and mental health challenges. Studies measure these relationships using correlation coefficients, where 1.0 indicates a perfect connection, and 0 indicates no connection. The findings reveal significant associations: depression scores range from 0.48 (moderately strong) to 0.05 (weak), anxiety from 0.47 to 0.03, and suicidal thoughts from 0.41 to -0.08 [118].

These numbers tell an important story – even at their lowest levels, parental psychological control shows some connection to mental health difficulties. At their highest levels, the relationship becomes quite strong, with nearly half the variation in children’s mental health challenges potentially linked to this form of control [118].

Children often maintain relationships with manipulative family members to avoid losing connections with their parents [119]. This creates an emotionally complex dynamic where victims develop ambivalent feelings towards their abuser [120]. Studies show an inverse relationship between maternal warmth and psychological control, indicating higher levels of manipulation correlate with reduced emotional support [121].

The psychological impact includes developing maladaptive coping strategies (unhealthy ways of handling stress) [122]. Adults who experienced childhood parental manipulation report experiencing PTSD (posttraumatic stress disorder), attention problems, dissociation (feeling disconnected from reality), and panic attacks [123].

Research has documented over 50 different types of alienating behaviours that constitute psychological manipulation [124]. These include denigrating the other parent, limiting contact, and creating loyalty conflicts that pressure children to reject one parent without legitimate justification [125].

Long-term consequences include persistent difficulties with trust, self-esteem issues, and relationship problems that continue even after reunification with the alienated parent [126]. The manipulation’s impact on confidence and self-worth often creates a confused sense of self-perception and deep insecurity [127].

Educational Disruption and Social Isolation

Research shows that childhood trauma creates significant barriers to educational achievement [17]. Cross-sectional studies reveal lower IQs and marked deficits in language development among maltreated children compared to their peers [128].

The impact on academic performance proves particularly concerning. Studies demonstrate that affected youth show reduced grade point averages and increased difficulty maintaining attention in school settings [18]. This form of childhood trauma fundamentally disrupts children’s ability to engage with learning [129].

Evidence indicates that trauma affects multiple aspects of academic functioning. Children experiencing traumatic events show a decreased ability to pay attention, retain information, and participate in positive classroom interactions [130]. These challenges often lead to cascading risks of school failure [131].

Social relationships within educational settings face significant strain. Peer victimisation particularly impacts children’s academic and social functioning [132]. Research shows bullying occurs more frequently in mainstream classrooms and unstructured areas, with children having limited social support networks facing the highest risk [133].

Trauma creates numerous effects on school performance. Students experiencing trauma show notable changes in school engagement and attendance patterns [134]. Studies reveal that social and emotional well-being in educational settings directly connects to learning outcomes [135].

Educational disruption includes difficulty concentrating, challenges with emotional regulation (ability to manage feelings), and struggles with peer relationships [136]. These difficulties affect both classroom performance and social development [137].

Black students from high-socioeconomic-status families often attend schools with higher-risk environments, creating additional challenges for their educational experience [138]. Children experiencing trauma frequently face both internalising problems (anxiety, depression) and externalising problems (aggression, defiance) that affect their development [139].

Substance Abuse in the Family Environment

Studies reveal that childhood trauma from exposure to household substance abuse significantly affects health outcomes [55]. Research shows individuals who experience multiple adverse experiences face higher risks of problematic alcohol use (three to six times more likely) and drug use (seven times more likely) in their own lives [140].

Substance abuse within family environments creates lasting impacts on child development. Evidence indicates these effects appear in weight changes during early childhood, suggesting disruption of standard developmental patterns [141]. This form of childhood trauma mainly influences emotional regulation (ability to manage feelings) [142].

Research demonstrates that exposure during specific sensitive periods significantly affects brain development [143]. Studies show substance abuse can alter the activity of the locus coeruleus (a brain region involved in stress response), with increased norepinephrine release (stress hormone) [144].

The timing of substance abuse onset often corresponds with traumatic experiences. Many individuals report using substances to decrease posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms [145]. Studies indicate emotional neglect has powerful associations with drug dependency, especially in women [146].

Family alcohol misuse creates significant biological impacts. Research reveals increased inflammatory markers in family members, suggesting effects beyond immediate behavioural changes [147]. Children living with household members who abuse substances show significantly higher risks of developing similar problems later in life [6].

The transmission of substance use behaviours from parents to children occurs via multiple factors, including genetic predisposition, family environment, and parental attitudes [148]. Studies show parental substance abuse increases the likelihood of other adverse childhood experiences [149].

Evidence indicates that youth from substance-affected families face compounded challenges, including lower parental educational attainment [150]. Research shows over half of individuals exposed to childhood trauma report past or current substance use issues, often using substances to escape emotional pain [151].

Cultural and Racial Trauma

Research reveals that childhood trauma presents significant disparities across racial and ethnic groups [152]. Studies show the prevalence of four or more adverse experiences reaches 12.1% in White populations, rising dramatically to 21.5% for Black populations, 25.6% for Latinx groups, and 40.8% for Indigenous/Native American communities [153].

These differences stem from historical, structural, and economic inequalities. Evidence indicates discrimination represents a traumatic experience detectable in children as young as six years old [154]. This form of childhood trauma creates particularly concerning impacts on youth development [155].

Studies demonstrate Black adolescents encounter an average of five discriminatory experiences daily [156]. These encounters negatively affect crucial developmental processes, including ethnic-racial identity and self-concept (how young people view themselves) [157]. Research shows discriminatory experiences correlate with elevated levels of depression, anxiety, and suicidal thoughts [158].

The impact varies across different contexts, such as schools and neighbourhoods. Black youth face racial discrimination at significantly higher rates than other ethnic-racial minority groups [159]. These experiences prove particularly damaging due to their distressing and cognitively taxing nature [160].

Cultural coping strategies, especially racial socialisation within families, can protect against adverse effects [161]. Parents engage in practices that build racial and cultural pride while preparing youth for potential bias [162]. However, research indicates young European Americans show greater vulnerability when racial differences appear [163].

Black children experience disproportionate trauma exposure across all socioeconomic levels [164]. Studies show that high-income and highly educated Black families still report significant trauma exposure [165]. This indicates socioeconomic status provides less protection against childhood trauma for Black children compared to their White counterparts [166].

Research reveals higher rates of trauma exposure among Hispanic/Latino populations, with more than three in four reporting at least one adverse childhood experience [167]. Studies also indicate that Hispanic/Latina women report experiencing abuse at younger ages and with greater severity compared to other groups [168].

Complex trauma often occurs within social institutions and compounds throughout life [169]. Historical trauma, including the forced removal of children from family and culture, has contributed to high rates of child maltreatment in various communities [170]. These experiences create deep-rooted impacts that affect not just individuals but entire communities [171].

Bullying and Peer Abuse

Research shows that childhood trauma from bullying affects between 10% and 30% of children globally [172]. Studies define bullying as systematic abuse of power involving aggressive behaviour or intentional harm carried out repeatedly with an imbalance of power between victim and perpetrator [173].

This form of abuse takes multiple forms. Physical bullying includes hitting and kicking, while verbal abuse involves threats and name-calling. Relational bullying focuses on social exclusion and rumour spreading [174]. Studies reveal these forms occur at rates of 33% for physical, 50% for verbal, and 31% for relational bullying [175].

The impact of childhood trauma from bullying creates significant physiological changes. Children who experience frequent bullying show altered stress responses, specifically not exhibiting typical increases in cortisol (stress hormone) following stressful situations [176]. Research demonstrates that victims at ages 8 and 10 years show increased sleep disturbances, including nightmares and night terrors, by age 12 [177].

Children exposed to chronic bullying face severe risks. Studies show those experiencing relational and repeated peer victimisation have a seven times higher risk of developing psychological symptoms compared to non-bullied children [178]. This victimisation affects inner working models of relationships, disturbing the ability to trust and interact appropriately with others [179].

The consequences prove particularly severe. Bullied children are three times more likely to report suicidal thoughts or attempt suicide compared to their non-bullied peers [180]. Research reveals transparent dose-effect relationships, where more frequent bullying leads to more severe adult outcomes [181].

Recent trends indicate increasing cyberbullying victimisation among all youth [182]. Appearance-based bullying mainly affects females, leading to reduced self-esteem and body dissatisfaction [183]. These experiences significantly impact school engagement and create increased isolation [184].

Research demonstrates that bullying experiences predict adverse psychological outcomes measured six months later [185]. The stress of the educational environment and the focus on academic performance can worsen the school climate, potentially increasing bullying incidents [186]. In severe cases, physical victimisation requires emergency medical treatment, with some children developing posttraumatic stress disorder following these assaults [187].

Childhood Trauma: Paths to Healing

Research demonstrates that childhood trauma can be addressed through evidence-based interventions [189]. Studies support the effectiveness of early detection and intervention programmes, showing positive, lifelong impacts on health and well-being [190].

Healthcare approaches emphasise trauma-informed practice, requiring professionals to understand adversity’s impacts, recognise toxic stress symptoms, and prevent re-traumatisation [191]. Evidence indicates that screening families during routine child healthcare provides crucial opportunities for support and referral [192].

Treatment effectiveness varies based on individual trauma history [193]. Studies show those who experienced childhood maltreatment may respond differently to standard interventions, highlighting the need for personalised approaches [194]. This form of childhood trauma requires comprehensive support systems, including integrated medical-behavioural care [195].

Safety assurance forms the essential first step in trauma treatment [196]. Recovery becomes possible only in safe, violence-free environments where traumatic memories can be processed while developing necessary social and emotional skills [23]. Research supports various strategies, including anti-inflammatory interventions and methods to enhance adaptive immunity [197].

Prevention proves particularly crucial. Evidence supports programmes like the Nurse-Family Partnership and Triple P (Positive Parenting Programme) in reducing child maltreatment [198]. These interventions show potential long-term positive mental health outcomes [199].

Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) demonstrates significant effectiveness, particularly Trauma-Focused CBT for children and adolescents dealing with posttraumatic stress disorder [200]. Meta-analyses reveal small to medium effectiveness for self-reported measures, with notable improvements in clinician-reported outcomes [201].

Support from both family and school environments plays a vital role in recovery [202]. Strong family connections combined with safe, supportive school settings help reduce adverse mental health outcomes [203]. Prevention programmes should incorporate trauma-informed approaches considering survivors’ unique needs [204].

Research emphasises that developing resilience offers a crucial healing path [205]. Studies define resilience as qualities enabling individuals to thrive despite adversity, showing protective effects against depression and suicidal thoughts [206]. Treatment approaches must integrate trauma-informed care practices for holistic, effective management of associated conditions [207].

The understanding of childhood trauma continues to evolve, revealing both its profound impacts and the resilient nature of the human spirit. Through increased awareness, evidence-based interventions, and comprehensive support systems, paths to healing become clearer.

While the effects of childhood trauma run deep, research demonstrates that recovery is possible when approached with understanding, patience, and appropriate support. The path from trauma to healing may be difficult. Still, it represents a testament to human adaptability and the transformative power of proper care and intervention.

Sources

• [1] Hillis, S., Mercy, J., Amobi, A., & Kress, H. (2016). Global prevalence of past-year violence against children: A systematic review and minimum estimates. Pediatrics, 137(3), e20154079.
• [2] Control, C. f. D. (2019). Preventing Adverse Childhood Experiences: Leveraging the Best Available Evidence. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
• [3] Brown CL, Yilanli M, Rabbitt AL. Child Physical Abuse and Neglect. 2023 May 29. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan–.
• [4] Hornor G. (2015). Childhood trauma exposure and toxic stress: what the pnp needs to know. Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 29(2), 191-198.
• [5] Fang, X., Fry, D.A., Brown, D.S., et al. (2015). The burden of child maltreatment in the East Asia and Pacific region. Child Abuse & Neglect, 42, 146-162.
• [6] Felitti, V.J., Anda, R.F., Nordenberg, D., et al. (1998). Relationship of Childhood Abuse and Household Dysfunction to Many of the Leading Causes of Death in Adults: The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 14(4), 245-258.
• [7] Cloitre, M., Stolbach, B.C., Herman, J.L., van der Kolk, B., Pynoos, R., Wang, J., Petkova, E. (2009). A developmental approach to complex PTSD: childhood and adult cumulative trauma as predictors of symptom complexity. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 22(5), 399-408.
• [8] Shonkoff, J.P., Boyce, W.T., McEwen, B.S. (2009). Neuroscience, molecular biology, and the childhood roots of health disparities: building a new framework for health promotion and disease prevention. JAMA.
• [9] McGloin, J.M., Widom, C.S. (2001). Resilience among abused and neglected children grown up. Development and Psychopathology, 13(4), 1021-1038.
• [10] Kessler, R.C., McLaughlin, K.A., Green, J.G., et al. (2010). Childhood adversities and adult psychopathology in the WHO World Mental Health Surveys. British Journal of Psychiatry, 197, 378-385.
• [11] American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., Text rev.).
• [12] Myers, J.E.B. (2011). Child maltreatment: A collection of readings. SAGE Publications.
• [13] Hecht, K.F., Cicchetti, D., Rogosch, F.A., Crick, N. (2014). Borderline personality features in childhood: the role of subtype, developmental timing and chronicity of child maltreatment. Developmental Psychopathology, 26, 805-815.
• [14] Jenny, C. (2011). Child abuse and neglect: Diagnosis, treatment, and evidence (1st ed.). St. Louis: Saunders/Elsevier.
• [15] Cicchetti, D., Rogosch, F.A., Gunnar, M.R., Toth, S.L. (2010). The Differential Impacts of Early Physical and Sexual Abuse and Internalizing Problems on Daytime Cortisol Rhythm in School-Aged Children. Child Development, 81(1), 252-269.
• [16] Suglia, S.F., Koenen, K.C., Boynton-Jarrett, R., et al. (2018). Childhood and Adolescent Adversity and Cardiometabolic Outcomes: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation, 137, e15-e28.
• [17] Aber, J.L., Allen, J.P., Carlson, V., Cicchetti, D. (1989). The effects of maltreatment on development during early childhood. Child maltreatment: Theory and research on the causes and consequences of child abuse and neglect. Cambridge University Press.
• [18] Rees, D.I., & Sabia, J.J. (2013). Forced intercourse, mental health, and human capital. Southern Economic Journal, 80, 324-344.
• [19] Noll, J.G., Trickett, P.K., Susman, E.J., Putnam, F.W. (2006). Sleep Disturbances and Childhood Sexual Abuse. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 31(5), 469-480.
• [20] Fergusson, D.M., Boden, J.M., Horwood, L.J. (2013). Childhood self-control and adult outcomes: Results from a 30-year longitudinal study. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 52, 709-717.
• [21] Alink, L., Cicchetti, D., Kim, J., Rogosch, F. (2009). Mediating and moderating processes in the relation between maltreatment and psychopathology: Mother-child relationship quality and emotion regulation. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37, 831-843.
• [22] Bor, W., Dean, A.J., Najman, J., & Hayatbakhsh, R. (2014). Are child and adolescent mental health problems increasing in the 21st century? A systematic review. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 48(7), 606-616.
• [23] Huang, Y.L., Fonagy, P., Feigenbaum, J., Montague, P.R., Nolte, T. (2020). Multidirectional pathways between attachment, mentalising, and posttraumatic stress symptomatology in the context of childhood trauma. Psychopathology, 53, 48-58.
• [24] Easton, S.D. (2013). Disclosure of child sexual abuse among adult male survivors. Clinical Social Work Journal, 41, 344-355.
• [25] Khan Mm. The Concept of Cumulative Trauma. Psychoanal Study Child. 1963;18:286-306.
• [26] Fraser, J.A., Mathews, B., Walsh, K., Chen, L., Dunne, M. (2010). Factors influencing child abuse and neglect recognition and reporting by nurses: A multivariate analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 47, 146-153.
• [27] Danese, A., & McEwen, B.S. (2012). Adverse childhood experiences, allostasis, allostatic load, and age-related disease. Physiology & Behavior, 106, 29-39.
• [28] Pechtel, P., & Pizzagalli, D.A. (2011). Effects of early life stress on cognitive and affective function: an integrated review of human literature. Psychopharmacology, 214, 55-70.
• [29] Teicher, M.H., & Samson, J.A. (2016). Annual research review: enduring neurobiological effects of childhood abuse and neglect. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 57, 241-266.
• [30] Miller, G.E., Chen, E., & Parker, K.J. (2011). Psychological stress in childhood and susceptibility to the chronic diseases of aging: moving toward a model of behavioral and biological mechanisms. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 959-997.
• [31] McGowan, P.O., Sasaki, A., D’alessio, A.C., et al. (2009). Epigenetic regulation of the glucocorticoid receptor in human brain associates with childhood abuse. Nature Neuroscience, 12, 342-348.
• [32] Gonzalez, A. (2013). The impact of childhood maltreatment on biological systems: implications for clinical interventions. Paediatrics & Child Health, 18, 415-418.
• [33] Teicher, M.H., Samson, J.A., Anderson, C.M., & Ohashi, K. (2016). The effects of childhood maltreatment on brain structure, function and connectivity. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 17, 652-666.
• [34] Dunn, E.C., Soare, T.W., Zhu, Y., et al. (2019). Sensitive periods for the effect of childhood adversity on DNA methylation: results from a prospective, longitudinal study. Biological Psychiatry, 85, 838-849.
• [35] Ruttle, P.L., Shirtcliff, E.A., Armstrong, J.M., Klein, M.H., & Essex, M.J. (2015). Neuroendocrine coupling across adolescence and the longitudinal influence of early life stress. Developmental Psychobiology, 57, 688-704.
• [36] Danese, A., & Baldwin, J.R. (2017). Hidden wounds? Inflammatory links between childhood trauma and psychopathology. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 517-544.
• [37] Martin-Blanco, A., Ferrer, M., Soler, J., et al. (2016). The role of hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal genes and childhood trauma in borderline personality disorder. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 266, 307-316.
• [38] Caspi, A., McCray, J., Moffitt, T.E., et al. (2002). Role of genotype in the cycle of violence in maltreated children. Science, 297, 851-854.
• [39] Sroufe, L.A., Coffino, B., & Carlson, E.A. (2010). Conceptualising the role of early experience: lessons from the Minnesota longitudinal study. Developmental Review, 30, 36-51.
• [40] Turner, H.A., Finkelhor, D., Ormrod, R., et al. (2012). Family context, victimisation, and child trauma symptoms: Variations in safe, stable, and nurturing relationships during early and middle childhood. The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 82, 209-219.
• [41] Ioannidis, K., Turner, L.R., & Tong, S. (2020). The complex neurobiology of resilient functioning after childhood maltreatment. BMC Medicine, 18, 32.
• [42] Narayan, A.J., Lieberman, A.F., & Masten, A.S. (2021). Intergenerational transmission and prevention of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs). Clinical Psychology Review, 85, 101997.
• [43] Kitzman, H., Olds, D.L., Henderson, C.R., et al. (1997). Effect of Prenatal and Infancy Home Visitation by Nurses on Pregnancy Outcomes, Childhood Injuries, and Repeated Childbearing. Journal of the American Medical Association, 278, 644-652.
• [44] Teicher, M.H., & Samson, J.A. (2013). Childhood maltreatment and psychopathology: A case for ecophenotypic variants as clinically and neurobiologically distinct subtypes. American Journal of Psychiatry, 170, 1114-1133.
• [45] Fava, N.M., Simon, V.A., Smith, E., et al. (2016). Perceptions of general and parenting-specific posttraumatic change among postpartum mothers with histories of childhood maltreatment. Child Abuse & Neglect, 56, 20-29.
• [46] Read, J., & Mayne, R. (2017). Understanding the long-term effects of childhood adversities: beyond diagnosis and abuse. Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma, 10, 289-297.
• [47] Turner, H.A., Shattuck, A., Finkelhor, D., & Hamby, S. (2015). Polyvictimization and youth violence exposure across contexts. Journal of Adolescent Health, 58, 208-214.
• [48] Dong, M., Anda, R.F., Felitti, V.J., et al. (2004). The interrelatedness of multiple forms of childhood abuse, neglect, and household dysfunction. Child Abuse & Neglect, 28(7), 771-784.
• [49] Sethi, D., Bellis, M.A., Hughes, K., et al. (2013). European report on preventing child maltreatment. Copenhagen: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe.
• [50] Myers, J.E., Berliner, L., Briere, J., et al. (2002). The APSAC handbook on child maltreatment (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• [51] Mandelli, L., Petrelli, C., & Serretti, A. (2015). The role of specific early trauma in adult depression: A meta-analysis of published literature. European Psychiatry, 30(6), 665-680.
• [52] McCrory, E., De Brito, S.A., & Viding, E. (2012). The link between child abuse and psychopathology: a review of neurobiological and genetic research. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 105, 151-156.
• [53] Johnson, J.G., Cohen, P., Smailes, E.M., et al. (2001). Childhood verbal abuse and risk for personality disorders during adolescence and early adulthood. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 42, 16-23.
• [54] Massie, H., & Szajnberg, N.M. (2006). My life is longing: child abuse and its adult sequelae-results of the Brody longitudinal study from birth to age 30. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 87, 471-496.
• [55] Hughes, K., Bellis, M.A., Hardcastle, K.A., et al. (2017). The effect of multiple adverse childhood experiences on health: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Public Health, 2(8), e356-e366.
• [56] McLaughlin, K.A., Sheridan, M.A., & Lambert, H.K. (2014). Childhood adversity and neural development: deprivation and threat as distinct dimensions of early experience. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 47, 578-591.
• [57] McCrory, E.J., De Brito, S.A., Kelly, P.A., et al. (2013). Amygdala activation in maltreated children during pre-attentive emotional processing. British Journal of Psychiatry, 202, 269-276.
• [58] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (May 16, 2024). Child Abuse and Neglect Prevention.
• [59] McCrory, E., & De Brito, S.A. (2011). The impact of childhood maltreatment: a review of neurobiological and genetic factors. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 2, 48.
• [60] Steine, I.M., Harvey, A.G., Krystal, J.H., et al. (2012). Sleep disturbances in sexual abuse victims: a systematic review. Sleep Medicine Reviews, 16, 15-25.
• [61] Barth, J., Bermetz, L., Heim, E., et al. (2013). The current prevalence of child sexual abuse worldwide: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Public Health, 58(3), 469-483.
• [62] De Bellis, M.D., Burke, L., Trickett, P.K., & Putnam, F.W. (1996). Antinuclear antibodies and thyroid function in sexually abused girls. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 9(2), 369-378.
• [63] Bremner, J.D., Randall, P., Vermetten, E., et al. (1997). Magnetic image resonance-based measurement of hippocampal volume in posttraumatic stress disorder related to childhood physical and sexual abuse: a preliminary report. Biological Psychiatry, 41, 23-32.
• [64] Insel, T.R., & Winslow, J. (1998). Serotonin and neuropeptides in affiliative behaviours. Biological Psychiatry, 44, 207-219.
• [65] Kaplan, C., Tarlow, N., Stewart, J.G., et al. (2016). Borderline personality disorder in youth: the prospective impact of child abuse on non-suicidal self-injury and suicidality. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 71, 86-94.
• [66] Lewis, T., McElroy, E., Harlaar, N., & Runyan, D. (2016). Does the impact of child sexual abuse differ from maltreated but non-sexually abused children? A prospective examination of the impact of child sexual abuse on internalising and externalising behaviour problems. Child Abuse & Neglect, 51, 31-40.
• [67] Turniansky, H., Ben-Dor, D., Krivoy, A., et al. (2019). A history of prolonged childhood sexual abuse is associated with more severe clinical presentation of borderline personality disorder in adolescent female inpatients-a naturalistic study. Child Abuse & Neglect, 98, 104222.
• [68] Cougle, J.R., Timpano, K.R., Sachs-Ericsson, N., et al. (2010). Examining the unique relationships between anxiety disorders and childhood physical and sexual abuse in the National Comorbidity Survey-Replication. Psychiatry Resources, 177, 150-155.
• [69] Hailes, H.P., Yu, R., Danese, A., & Fazel, S. (2019). Long-term outcomes of childhood sexual abuse: an umbrella review. Lancet Psychiatry, 6, 830-839.
• [70] Currie, J., & Widom, C.S. (2010). Long-term consequences of child abuse and neglect on adult economic well-being. Child Maltreatment, 15, 111-120.
• [71] Black, M.C., Basile, K.C., Breiding, M.J., et al. (2011). The national intimate partner and sexual violence survey: 2010 summary report. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
• [72] Harman, J.J., Bernet, W., & Harman, J. (2019). Parental alienation: the blossoming of a field of study. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(2), 212-217.
• [73] Massie, H., & Szajnberg, N.M. (2008). Lives across time/growing up: paths to emotional health and emotional illness from birth to age 30 in 76 people (2nd ed.). London: Karnac.
• [74] Li, L., Manor, O., & Power, C. (2004). Early environment and child-to-adult growth trajectories in the 1958 British birth cohort. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.
• [75] Richards, M., & Wadsworth, M.E. (2004). Long term effects of early adversity on cognitive function. Archives of Disease in Childhood.
• [76] Hetherington, E.M. (2003). Intimate pathways: Changing patterns in close personal relationships across time. Family Relations, 52(4), 318-331.
• [77] Beckmeyer, J. J., Markham, M. S., & Troilo, J. (2022). Domains of Ongoing Communication Between Former Spouses: Associations With Parenting Stress and Children’s Post-Divorce Well-Being. Journal of Family Issues, 43(6), 1579-1600.
• [78] Sbarra, D.A., & Emery, R.E. (2008). Deeper into divorce: Using actor-partner analyses to explore systemic differences in coparenting conflict following custody dispute resolution. Journal of Family Psychology, 22, 144-152.
• [79] Deardorff, J., Ekwaru, J.P., Kushi, L.H., et al. (2011). Father absence, body mass index, and pubertal timing in girls: Differential effects by family income and ethnicity. Journal of Adolescent Health, 48, 441-447.
• [80] Culpin, I., Heron, J., Araya, R., et al. (2014). Father absence and timing of menarche in adolescent girls from a UK cohort: The mediating role of maternal depression and major financial problems. Journal of Adolescence, 37, 291-301.
• [81] McCrory, C., Fiorito, G., Hernandez, B., et al. (2021). GrimAge outperforms other epigenetic clocks in the prediction of age-related clinical phenotypes and all-cause mortality. The Journals of Gerontology, 76(5), 741-749.
• [82] Friedman, E.M., Montez, J.K., Sheehan, C.M., et al. (2015). Childhood adversities and adult cardiometabolic health: does the quantity, timing, and type of adversity matter? Journal of Aging Health, 27, 1311-1338.
• [83] American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC.
• [84] Harman, J.J., Leder-Elder, S., & Biringen, Z. (2016). Prevalence of parental alienation drawn from a representative poll. Children and Youth Services Review, 66, 62-66.
• [85] Bernet, W., & Greenhill, L. (2022). The five-factor model for the diagnosis of parental alienation. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry.
• [86] Anda, RF., Felitti, VJ., Bremner, JD., et al. The enduring effects of abuse and related adverse experiences in childhood. A convergence of evidence from neurobiology and epidemiology. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience. 2006; 256:174-186.
• [87] Boynton-Jarrett R, Fargnoli J, Suglia SF, Zuckerman B, Wright RJ. Association between maternal intimate partner violence and incident obesity in preschool-aged children: results from the Fragile Families and Child Well-being Study. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine. 2010;164(6):540–546.
• [88] Sardinha L, Maheu-Giroux M, Stöckl H, Meyer SR, García-Moreno C. Global, regional, and national prevalence estimates of physical or sexual, or both, intimate partner violence against women in 2018. Lancet. 2022 Feb 26;399(10327):803-813.
• [89] Vu NL, Jouriles EN, McDonald R, Rosenfield D. Children’s exposure to intimate partner violence: a meta-analysis of longitudinal associations with child adjustment problems. Clinical Psychology Review. 2016;46:25–33.
• [90] Rigterink T, Fainsilber KL, Hessler DM. Domestic violence and longitudinal associations with children’s physiological regulation abilities. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2010.
• [91] Koenen KC, Moffitt TE, Caspi A, Taylor A, Purcell S. Domestic violence is associated with environmental suppression of IQ in young children. Development and Psychopathology. 2003;15(2):297–311.
• [92] Dong, M., Giles, WH., Felitti, VJ., Dube, SR., Williams, JE., Chapman, DP., Anda, RF. Insights into causal pathways for ischemic heart disease: adverse childhood experiences study. Circulation. 2004;110:1761-1766.
• [93] Perry BD, Pollard R. Homeostasis, stress, trauma, and adaptation: A neurodevelopmental view of childhood trauma. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America. 1998;7:33–51.
• [94] Tanaka, M., Wekerle, C., Leung, E., Waechter, R., Gonzalez, A., Jamieson, E., & MacMillan, HL. Preliminary evaluation of the childhood experiences of violence questionnaire short form. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2012;27(2):396–407.
• [95] Radford L, Corral S, Bradley C, Fisher HL. The prevalence and impact of child maltreatment and other types of victimisation in the UK: findings from a population survey of caregivers, children and young people and young adults. Child Abuse & Neglect. 2013;37(10):801–13.
• [96] Rivara F, Menestrel SL. Preventing Bullying: Through Science, Policy and Practice. The National Academic Press; Washington, DC, USA: 2016.
• [97] Temple JR, Shorey RC, Tortolero SR, Wolfe DA, Stuart GL. Importance of gender and attitudes about violence in the relationship between exposure to interparental violence and the perpetration of teen dating violence. Child Abuse & Neglect. 2013;37:343–352.
• [98] Howell KH, Barnes SE, Miller LE, Graham-Bermann SA. Developmental variations in the impact of intimate partner violence exposure during childhood. Journal of Injury and Violence Research. 2014;8:43–57.
• [99] Otte, C., Neylan, TC., Pole, N., Metzler, T., Best, S., Henn-Haase, C., Marmar, CR. Association between childhood trauma and catecholamine response to psychological stress in police academy recruits. Biological Psychiatry. 2005;57(1):27-32.
• [100] Van Veen T, Wardenaar KJ, Carlier IVE, Spinhoven P, Penninx b., & Zitman FG. Are childhood and adult life adversities differentially associated with specific symptom dimensions of depression and anxiety? Testing the tripartite model. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2013;146(2):238–245.
• [101] Hibbard R, Barlow J, MacMillan H, Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect, & American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Child Maltreatment and Violence Committee. Psychological maltreatment. Pediatrics. 2012;130:372–378.
• [102] Lyons-Ruth K, Bureau J-F, Holmes B, Easterbrooks A, Brooks NH. Borderline symptoms and suicidality/self-injury in late adolescence: prospectively observed relationship correlates in infancy and childhood. Psychiatry Research. 2013;206:273–81.
• [103] Pignatelli AM, Wampers M, Loriedo C, Biondi M, Vanderlinden J. Childhood neglect in eating disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Trauma Dissociation. 2017;18:100–115.
• [104] Leeb RT, Paulozzi L, Melanson C, Simon T, Arias I. Child maltreatment surveillance: uniform definitions for public health and recommended data elements. Version 1.0. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Atlanta: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; 2008.
• [105] Boynton-Jarrett R, Harville EW. A prospective study of childhood social hardships and age at menarche. Annals of Epidemiology. 2012.
• [106] Pollak SD, Nelson CA, Schlaak MF, Roeber BJ, Wewerka SS, Wiik KL, Frenn KA, Loman MM, Gunnar MR. Neurodevelopmental effects of early deprivation in postinstitutionalized children. Child Development. 2010;81(1):224–236.
• [107] Jaffee SR, Maikovich-Fong AK. Effects of chronic maltreatment and maltreatment timing on children’s behavior and cognitive abilities. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2011;52(2):184–194.
• [108] Perry BD. Childhood experience and the expression of genetic potential: What childhood neglect tells us about nature and nurture. Brain Mind. 2002;3:79–100.
• [109] Nelson J, Klumparendt A, Doebler P, Ehring T. Childhood maltreatment and characteristics of adult depression: meta-analysis. British Journal of Psychiatry. 2017;210:96-104.
• [110] Paivio SC, McCulloch CR. Alexithymia as a mediator between childhood trauma and self-injurious behaviours. Child Abuse & Neglect. 2004;28:339–354.
• [111] Pilkington P, Bishop A, & Younan R. Adverse childhood experiences and early maladaptive schemas in adulthood: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy. 2020.
• [112] Lawler MJ, Talbot EB. Encyclopedia of Human Behavior. Elsevier; 2012. Child abuse; pp. 460–6.
• [113] Johnson JG, Smailes EM, Cohen P, Brown J, Bernstein DP. Associations between four types of childhood neglect and personality disorder symptoms during adolescence and early adulthood: findings of a community-based longitudinal study. Journal of Personality Disorders. 2000;14:171–87.
• [114] Barber BK. Parental psychological control: Revisiting a neglected construct. Child Development. 1996;67:3296–3319.
• [115] Hamarman S, Bernet W. Evaluating and reporting emotional abuse in children: parent-based, action-based focus aids in clinical decision-making. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 2000;39(7):928-930.
• [116] Paine ML, Hansen DJ. Factors influencing children to self-disclose sexual abuse. Clinical Psychology Review. 2002;22(2):271-295.
• [117] Baker AJL. The long-term effects of parental alienation on adult children: A qualitative research study. American Journal of Family Therapy. 2005;33:289–302.
• [118] Pinquart M. Associations of parenting dimensions and styles with internalising symptoms in children and adolescents: A meta-analysis. Marriage & Family Review. 2017;53:613–640.
• [119] Ullman SE. Social reactions to child sexual abuse disclosures: A critical review. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse. 2003;12(1):89-121.
• [120] Berliner L, Conte JR. The process of victimisation: The victims’ perspective. Child Abuse & Neglect. 1990;14:29-40.
• [121] Cero I, Sifers SK. Parenting behavior and the interpersonal-psychological theory of suicide: A mediated moderation analysis with adolescents. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2013;150:987–992.
• [122] Verrocchio MC, Marchetti D, Fulcheri M. Perceived parental functioning, self-esteem, and psychological distress in adults whose parents are separated/divorced. Frontiers in Psychology. 2015.
• [123] Bentley C, Matthewson M. The not-forgotten child: alienated adult children’s experience of parental alienation. American Journal of Family Therapy. 2020;48(5):509-529.
• [124] Harman, J. J., & Matthewson, M. (2020). Parental alienating behaviors. In D. Lorandos and W. Bernet (Eds.), Parental Alienation- Science and Law, pp. 82-141. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas Publisher.
• [125] Baker AJL, Chambers J. Adult recall of childhood exposure to parental conflict: unpacking the black box of parental alienation. Journal of Divorce. 2011.
• [126] Ben-Ami N, Baker AJL. The long-term correlates of childhood exposure to parental alienation on adult self-sufficiency and well-being. American Journal of Family Therapy. 2012;40:169–183.
• [127] Mullen PE, Martin JL, Anderson JC, Romans SE, Herbison GP. The long-term impact of physical, emotional, and sexual abuse of children: A community study. Child Abuse & Neglect. 1996;20:7–21.
• [128] McFadyen RG, Kitson WJH. Language comprehension and expression among adolescents who have experienced childhood physical abuse. Journal of Child Psychiatry and Psychology. 1996;37(5):551–562.
• [129] O’Connell DJ. Investigating latent trait and life course theories as predictors of recidivism among an offender sample. Journal of Criminal Justice. 2003;31(5):455-467.
• [130] DuPaul GJ, Reid R, Anastopoulos AD, Power TJ. Assessing ADHD symptomatic behaviors and functional impairment in school settings: Impact of student and teacher characteristics. School Psychology Quarterly. 2014;29(4):409–421.
• [131] Cole SF, O’Brien JG, Gadd MG, Ristuccia J, Wallace DL, Gregory M. Helping traumatised children learn: Supportive school environments for children traumatised by family violence. Boston: Massachusetts Advocates for Children; 2005.
• [132] Adams R, et al. Peer victimisation and educational outcomes in mainstreamed adolescents with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 2016;46(11):3557–3566.
• [133] Hebron J, Oldfield J, Humphrey N. Cumulative risk effects in the bullying of children and young people with autism spectrum conditions. Autism. 2017;21(3):291–300.
• [134] Dorado JS, Martinez M, McArthur LE, Liebovitz T. Healthy Environments and Response to Trauma in Schools (HEARTS): A school-based, multi-level comprehensive prevention and intervention program for creating trauma-informed, safe and supportive schools. School Mental Health. 2016;8:144–162.
• [135] Atallah DG, Koslouski JB, Perkins KN, Marsico C, Porche MV. An evaluation of Trauma and Learning Policy Initiative’s (TLPI) inquiry-based process: Year three. Boston: Boston University, Wheelock College of Education and Human Development; 2019.
• [136] Giboney Wall CR. Relationship over reproach: Fostering resilience by embracing a trauma-informed approach to elementary education. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma. 2020.
• [137] Goss P, Sonnemann J, Griffiths K. Engaging students: Creating classrooms that improve learning. Grattan Institute. 2017.
• [138] Boyce S, Bazargan M, Caldwell CH, Zimmerman MA, Assari S. Protective Effects of Parental Educational Attainment on School Social Environmental Risk: Blacks’ Diminished Returns in Urban Public Schools. Children. 2020;7:44.
• [139] Johnston JR, Lee S, Olesen NW, Walters MG. Allegations and substantiations of abuse in custody-disputing families. Family Court Review. 2005;43(2):283-294.
• [140] Koss MP, Yuan NP, Dightman D, et al. Adverse childhood exposures and alcohol dependence among seven Native American tribes. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2003;25:238-244.
• [141] Schmeer KK. Family structure and obesity in early childhood. Social Science Research. 2012.
• [142] Espeleta HC, Brett EI, Ridings LE et al. Childhood adversity and adult health‐risk behaviors: examining the roles of emotion dysregulation and urgency. Child Abuse & Neglect. 2018;82:92‐
• [143] Heyer DB, Meredith RM. Environmental toxicology: Sensitive periods of development and neurodevelopmental disorders. Neurotoxicology. 2017;58:23–41.
• [144] Abercrombie ED, Jacobs BL. Single-unit response of noradrenergic neurons in the locus coeruleus of freely moving cats. I. Acutely presented stressful and non-stressful stimuli. Journal of Neuroscience. 1987;7:2837–2847.
• [145] Bremner JD, Southwick M, Darnell MA, Charney DS. Chronic PTSD in Vietnam combat veterans: Course of illness and substance abuse. American Journal of Psychiatry. 1996;153:369–375.
• [146] Enoch MA. The role of early life stress as a predictor for alcohol and drug dependence. Psychopharmacology. 2011;214:17-31.
• [147] Alho H, Sillanaukee P, Kalela A, Jaakkola O, Laine S, Nikkari S. Alcohol misuse increases serum antibodies to oxidised LDL and C-reactive protein. Alcohol and Alcoholism. 2004;39:312-315.
• [148] Gaete J, Araya R. Individual and contextual factors associated with tobacco, alcohol, and cannabis use among Chilean adolescents: a multilevel study. Journal of Adolescence. 2017;56:166-178.
• [149] Kendler KS, Ohlsson H, Sundquist K, Sundquist J. Sources of parent-child transmission of drug abuse: path analyses of not-lived-with parental, stepparental, triparental, and adoptive families. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 2018;206:239-244.
• [150] Lees B, Stapinski LA, Teesson M, Squeglia LM, Jacobus J, Mewton L. Problems experienced by children from families with histories of substance misuse: an ABCD study. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2021;218:108403.
• [151] Baker AJL. Adult Children of Parental Alienation Syndrome: Breaking the Ties that Bind. WW Norton & Company; New York, NY, USA: 2007.
• [152] Kuentzel JG, Arble E, Boutros N, Chugani D, Barnett D. Nonsuicidal self-injury in an ethnically diverse college sample. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. 2012;82:291–297.
• [153] Assini‐Meytin LC, Fix RL, Green KM et al. Adverse childhood experiences, mental health, and risk behaviors in adulthood: exploring sex, racial, and ethnic group differences in a nationally representative sample. Journal of Child Adolescent Trauma. 2022;15:833‐
• [154] Brown CS, Bigler RS. Children’s perceptions of discrimination: A developmental model. Child Development. 2005;76(3):533–553.
• [155] English D, Lambert SF, Tynes BM, Bowleg L, Zea MC, Howard LC. Daily multidimensional racial discrimination among Black U.S. American adolescents. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. 2020;66:101068.
• [156] Jernigan MM, Daniel JH. Racial trauma in the lives of Black children and adolescents: Challenges and clinical implications. Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma. 2011;4(2):123–141.
• [157] Hughes DL, Watford JA, Del Toro J. A transactional/ecological perspective on ethnic–racial Identity, socialisation, and discrimination. Advances in Child Development and Behavior. 2016;51:1–41.
• [158] Greene ML, Way N, Pahl K. Trajectories of perceived adult and peer discrimination among Black, Latino, and Asian American adolescents: patterns and psychological correlates. Developmental Psychology. 2006;42(2):218.
• [159] Pachter LM, Coll CG. Racism and child health: A review of the literature and future directions. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics. 2009;30(3):255–263.
• [160] Gibbons FX, O’Hara RE, Stock ML, Gerrard M, Weng CY, Wills TA. The erosive effects of racism: Reduced self-control mediates the relation between perceived racial discrimination and substance use in African American adolescents. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2012;102(5):1089–1104.
• [161] Anderson RE, Stevenson HC. RECASTing racial stress and trauma: Theorising the healing potential of racial socialisation in families. American Psychologist. 2019;74(1):63.
• [162] Wang MT, Henry DA, Smith LV, Huguley JP, Guo J. Parental ethnic‐racial socialisation practices and children of color’s psychosocial and behavioral adjustment: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. American Psychologist. 2020;75(1):1–
• [163] Schilling EA, Aseltine RH Jr, Gore S. Adverse childhood experiences and mental health in young adults: a longitudinal survey. BMC Public Health. 2007;7:30.
• [164] Assari S, Caldwell CH, Mincy R. Family Socioeconomic Status at Birth and Youth Impulsivity at Age 15; Blacks’ Diminished Return. Children. 2018;5:58.
• [165] Assari S, Gibbons FX, Simons R. Depression among Black Youth; Interaction of Class and Place. Brain Sciences. 2018;8:108.
• [166] Berg AO, Aas M, Larsson S, Nerhus M, Hauff E, Andreassen OA, Melle I. Childhood trauma mediates the association between ethnic minority status and more severe hallucinations in psychotic disorder. Psychological Medicine. 2015;45:133–142.
• [167] Llabre MM, Schneiderman N, Gallo LC, et al. Childhood trauma and adult risk factors and disease in Hispanics/Latinos in the US: Results from the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL) Sociocultural Ancillary Study. Psychosomatic Medicine. 2017;79(2):172-180.
• [168] Arroyo JA, Simpson TL, Aragon AS. Childhood sexual abuse among Hispanic and Non-Hispanic White college women. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences. 1997;19(1):57–68.
• [169] Kezelman C, Stavropoulos P. Practice guidelines for treatment of complex trauma and trauma informed care and service delivery. Sydney: Blue Knot Foundation; 2012.
• [170] O’Donnell M, Taplin S, Marriott R, Lima F, Stanley FJ. Infant removals: The need to address the over-representation of Aboriginal infants and community concerns of another ‘stolen generation’. Child Abuse & Neglect. 2019;90:88–98.
• [171] Mohatt NV, Thompson AB, Thai ND, Tebes JK. Historical trauma as public narrative: A conceptual review of how history impacts present-day health. Social Science Medicine. 2014;106:128–136.
• [172] Craig W, Harel-Fisch Y, Fogel-Grinvald H, Dostaler S, Hetland J, Simons-Morton B, et al. A cross-national profile of bullying and victimisation among adolescents in 40 countries. International Journal of Public Health. 2009;54(2):216–224.
• [173] Gredler, Gilbert. (2003). Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 140 pp. Psychology in The Schools – PSYCHOL SCH. 40. 699-700. 10.1002/pits.10114.
• [174] Crick NR, Grotpeter JK. Children’s treatment by peers: victims of relational and overt aggression. Developmental Psychopathology. 1996;8:367–80.
• [175] Maïano C, et al. Prevalence of school bullying among youth with autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Autism Research. 2016;9(6):601–615.
• [176] Ouellet-Morin I, Danese A, Bowes L, et al. A discordant monozygotic twin design shows blunted cortisol reactivity among bullied children. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 2011.
• [177] Wolke D, Lereya ST. Bullying and parasomnias: a longitudinal cohort study. Pediatrics. 2014.
• [178] Wolke D, Schreier A, Zanarini MC, Winsper C. Bullied by peers in childhood and borderline personality symptoms at 11 years of age: A prospective study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2012;53:846–55.
• [179] Staebler K, Renneberg B, Stopsack M, Fiedler P, Weiler M, Roepke S. Facial emotional expression in reaction to social exclusion in borderline personality disorder. Psychological Medicine. 2011;41:1929–38.
• [180] Mayes SD, et al. Autism and reactive attachment/disinhibited social engagement disorders: Co-occurrence and differentiation. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2016.
• [181] Takizawa R, Maughan B, Arseneault L. Adult health outcomes of childhood bullying victimisation: evidence from a five-decade longitudinal British birth cohort. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2014;171(7):777–784.
• [182] Kennedy RS. Bullying Trends in the United States: A Meta-Regression. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. 2019.
• [183] Bucchianeri MM, Gower AL, McMorris BJ, Eisenberg ME. Youth experiences with multiple types of prejudice-based harassment. Journal of Adolescence. 2016;51:68–75.
• [184] Li Y, Doyle Lynch A, Kalvin C, Liu J, Lerner RM. Peer relationships as a context for the development of school engagement during early adolescence. International Journal of Behavioral Development. 2011;35(4):329–342.
• [185] Calvete E, Orue I, Gámez‐Guadix M. Cyberbullying victimisation and depression in adolescents: The mediating role of body image and cognitive schemas in a one‐year prospective study. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research. 2016;22(2):271–
• [186] Guerra NG, Williams KR, Sadek S. Understanding bullying and victimisation during childhood and adolescence: a mixed methods study. Child Development. 2011;82(1):295–310.
• [187] Kerns CM, Newschaffer CJ, Berkowitz SJ. Traumatic Childhood Events and Autism Spectrum Disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 2015;45(11):3475–3486.
• [189] Avellar SA, Supplee LH. Effectiveness of home visiting in improving child health and reducing child maltreatment. Pediatrics. 2013;132:S90-S99.
• [190] Garner AS, Shonkoff JP, Siegel BS, et al. Early childhood adversity, toxic stress, and the role of the pediatrician: translating developmental science into lifelong health. Pediatrics. 2012.
• [191] Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. SAMHSA’s concept of trauma and guidance for a trauma‐informed approach. Rockville: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2014.
• [192] Dubowitz H, Feigelman S, Lane W, et al. Pediatric primary care to help prevent child maltreatment: the Safe Environment for Every Kid (SEEK) model. Pediatrics. 2009;123:858-864.
• [193] Nanni V, Uher R, Danese A. Childhood maltreatment predicts unfavourable course of illness and treatment outcome in depression: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2012;169(2):141–151.
• [194] Macmillan HL, Wathen CN, Barlow J, Fergusson DM, Leventhal JM, Taussig HN. Interventions to prevent child maltreatment and associated impairment. Lancet. 2009;373:250–266.
• [195] Asarnow JR, Rozenman M, Wiblin J, Zeltzer L. Integrated medical-behavioral care compared with usual primary care for child and adolescent behavioral health: a meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatrics. 2015.
• [196] Sroufe LA, Egeland B, Carlson E, Collins WA. The development of the person: the Minnesota study of risk and adaptation from birth to adulthood. New York: Guilford; 2005.
• [197] Black DS, Slavich GM. Mindfulness meditation and the immune system: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2016;1373:13–24.
• [198] Donelan-McCall N, Eckenrode J, Olds DL. Home visiting for the prevention of child maltreatment: Lessons learned during the past 20 years. Pediatric Clinics of North America. 2009;56(2):389–403.
• [199] Prinz RJ, Sanders MR, Shapiro CJ, Whitaker DJ, Lutzker JR. Population-based prevention of child maltreatment: The US Triple P system population trial. Prevention Science. 2009;10(1):1–12.
• [200] Cohen JA, Mannarino AP. Trauma-focused Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for Traumatised Children and Families. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America. 2015;24(3):557–570.
• [201] Weston L, Hodgekins J, Langdon PE. Effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy with people who have autistic spectrum disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review. 2016;49:41–54.
• [202] Adams RE, Bukowski WM. Relationships with mothers and peers moderate the association between childhood sexual abuse and anxiety disorders. Child Abuse & Neglect. 2007;31(6):645–656.
• [203] Eisenberg ME, Ackard DM, Resnick MD. Protective Factors and Suicide Risk in Adolescents with a History of Sexual Abuse. The Journal of Pediatrics. 2007;151(5):482–487.
• [204] Nickerson AB. Preventing and Intervening with Bullying in Schools: A Framework for Evidence-Based Practice. School Mental Health. 2019;11(1):15–28.
• [205] Connor KM, Davidson JR. Development of a new resilience scale: the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depression and Anxiety. 2003;18:76–82.
• [206] Youssef NA, Green KT, Beckham JC, Elbogen EB. A 3-year longitudinal study examining the effect of resilience on suicidality in veterans. Annals of Clinical Psychiatry. 2013;25:59–66.
• [207] Lorenc T, Lester S, Sutcliffe K, Stansfield C, Thomas J. Interventions to support people exposed to adverse childhood experiences: systematic review of systematic reviews. BMC Public Health. 2020;20:657.